The effec­tive adop­tion of test automa­tion requires a phased and strate­gic approach. The best way to start is on a small scale and then grad­u­al­ly expand automa­tion. For exam­ple, launch­ing a pilot project helps to iden­ti­fy the best prac­tices and avoid com­mon mis­takes. Ini­tial­ly, it is advis­able to select sim­ple, fre­quent­ly repeat­ed tests that yield quick results and demon­strate the ben­e­fits of automation.

Man­ag­ing the test­ing envi­ron­ment is a key part of suc­cess­ful test automa­tion. Cloud-based test­ing envi­ron­ments and vir­tu­al­iza­tion enable flex­i­ble and cost-effec­tive test­ing. These solu­tions allow tests to be run in dif­fer­ent envi­ron­ments with­out the need for exten­sive infra­struc­ture main­te­nance. This is espe­cial­ly use­ful if the soft­ware is being devel­oped for mul­ti­ple plat­forms or devices.

Choos­ing the right tools plays a cru­cial role in the suc­cess of test automa­tion. The tools must meet both the orga­ni­za­tions and the software’s tech­ni­cal require­ments to ensure seam­less inte­gra­tion into exist­ing process­es. It is impor­tant to select test­ing solu­tions that sup­port the software’s tech­nol­o­gy and allow for easy expan­sion. For instance, Mod­el-Based Test­ing (MBT) can accel­er­ate the cre­ation of test cas­es and improve soft­ware qual­i­ty by reduc­ing man­u­al effort.

To ensure that test automa­tion deliv­ers real ben­e­fits, it must be part of a com­pre­hen­sive qual­i­ty strat­e­gy. The effec­tive­ness of test­ing should be mea­sured using key met­rics such as:

  • Test cov­er­age: How much of the appli­ca­tion is test­ed automatically?
  • Bug detec­tion speed: How quick­ly does automa­tion iden­ti­fy defects com­pared to man­u­al testing?
  • Test exe­cu­tion time: How long does it take to run auto­mat­ed tests com­pared to man­u­al testing?

The first step in a suc­cess­ful test automa­tion project is to ensure that test­ing process­es are well-orga­nized and that man­u­al tests are clear­ly doc­u­ment­ed. Automa­tion should be applied to test cas­es that pro­vide the great­est ben­e­fits. Par­tic­u­lar­ly use­ful cas­es for automa­tion include:

  • Regres­sion test­ing: Repeat­ed tests that ensure new code changes do not break pre­vi­ous­ly work­ing functionalities.
  • Per­for­mance test­ing: Tests that mea­sure the speed and scal­a­bil­i­ty of the software.
  • User load sim­u­la­tion tests: Tests that ensure the appli­ca­tion per­forms well under heavy traf­fic conditions.

Test repeata­bil­i­ty and scal­a­bil­i­ty are key fac­tors in mak­ing automa­tion cost-effec­tive. Tests should be designed in a way that allows easy updates and expan­sion as new fea­tures are intro­duced. Addi­tion­al­ly, auto­mat­ed tests should be exe­cut­ed reg­u­lar­ly, and their results should be con­tin­u­ous­ly ana­lyzed. Test automa­tion is espe­cial­ly help­ful with often updat­ed cloud solu­tions, like S/4HANA Pub­lic Cloud, where auto­mat­ic update cycle is man­dat­ing tests to take place eg. quar­ter­ly or bi-yearly.

Man­age­ment sup­port and ade­quate resourc­ing are essen­tial for the suc­cess of test automa­tion. Suf­fi­cient time and bud­get should be allo­cat­ed for tool selec­tion, train­ing, and test main­te­nance. It is also impor­tant to have clear­ly defined respon­si­bil­i­ties for the devel­op­ment and upkeep of test automa­tion with­in the orga­ni­za­tion. The entire team should under­stand the objec­tives and ben­e­fits of automa­tion to ensure smooth implementation.

Well-exe­cut­ed test automa­tion pro­vides sig­nif­i­cant ben­e­fits, such as short­er test­ing times, improved test cov­er­age, and more effi­cient use of resources. By reduc­ing man­u­al test­ing efforts, employ­ees can focus on more com­plex test­ing scenarios.

Automa­tion is a pow­er­ful tool when imple­ment­ed thought­ful­ly and as part of a com­pre­hen­sive test­ing strategy.

Blog Author

Asta Lehto is SAP Spe­cial­ist in Islet’s ERP team. With over 17 years of expe­ri­ence, she has been involved in sev­er­al SAP imple­men­ta­tion projects in com­pa­nies from dif­fer­ent industries.

More infor­ma­tion:

Juk­ka Pent­ti­nen
COO
jukka.​penttinen@​isletgroup.​fi
+358 40 355 1973

#ERPtest­ing #soft­waretest­ing #tes­tau­toma­tion #ERPtes­tau­toma­tion
Like what you read? Share this!